http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/index.htm#create

It is not a rare event that DNA mutates, observations suggest that there is a level of mutation at every cellular generation

The claim that mutatoins are all deletrious, while couched such that it can be claimed to merely be a statement on public opinion, is unsupportable, as beneficial mutations have been observed

Mutations do not produce new "kinds" they produce slight variations of the parent, any reasonable definition of a "kind" would require saltation to change in one generation, or without grey areas


scales had to have mutated into hair
breasts had to have evolved from nothing
hard-shelled externally laid eggs had to evolve into soft-shelled eggs that were nourished by an umbilical cord and placenta in a womb
etc.
None of these transformations have ever been observed in a laboratory.


The expectation that processes that take hundreds of thousands of years be observed in a laboratory, when such labs have only existed for a few centuries, and such transitions may be only one of many possible adaptations, is not flund in a true understanding of the ToE

Evidence, for example from the monotremes, suggests that mammaries may have evolved from sweat glands, not nothing